[Python-Dev] Possible optimization for LOAD_FAST ? (original) (raw)
Benjamin Peterson benjamin at python.org
Tue Dec 28 18:24:36 CET 2010
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Possible optimization for LOAD_FAST ?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Possible optimization for LOAD_FAST ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2010/12/28 Lukas Lueg <lukas.lueg at googlemail.com>:
Consider the following code:
def foobar(x): for i in range(5): x[i] = i The bytecode in python 2.7 is the following: 2 0 SETUPLOOP 30 (to 33) 3 LOADGLOBAL 0 (range) 6 LOADCONST 1 (5) 9 CALLFUNCTION 1 12 GETITER >> 13 FORITER 16 (to 32) 16 STOREFAST 1 (i) 3 19 LOADFAST 1 (i) 22 LOADFAST 0 (x) 25 LOADFAST 1 (i) 28 STORESUBSCR 29 JUMPABSOLUTE 13 >> 32 POPBLOCK >> 33 LOADCONST 0 (None) 36 RETURNVALUE Can't we optimize the LOADFAST in lines 19 and 25 to a single load and put the reference twice on the stack?
Yes. Would it be useful? Unlikely.
-- Regards, Benjamin
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Possible optimization for LOAD_FAST ?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Possible optimization for LOAD_FAST ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]