[Python-Dev] Two small PEP ideas (original) (raw)

Barry Warsaw barry at python.org
Mon May 3 17:30:22 CEST 2010

On May 01, 2010, at 08:58 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:

On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 21:09, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote:

Though maybe it should be called Conclusion instead of Accepted and used for Rejected PEPs, as well?

Good point.  What do you think about 'Resolution'? Fine with me.

I've updated PEP 1 and the supporting scripts to accept a Resolution: header. Note that in PEP 1 I wrote:

*Note: The Resolution header is required for Standards Track PEPs
only.  It contains a URL that should point to an email message or
other web resource where the pronouncement about the PEP is made.*

but in fact, the scripts make Resolution optional (it's kind of a pain to make it required just for Standards Track PEPs - contributions welcome).

-Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20100503/0e262342/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list