[Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement (original) (raw)
Lennart Regebro regebro at gmail.com
Sun May 23 13:17:51 CEST 2010
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 12:15, Brian Quinlan <brian at sweetapp.com> wrote:
You could make the same argument about any module in the stdlib.
Yeah, and that's exactly what I did.
I doubt it. Simple modules are unlikely to develop a following because it is too easy to partially replicate their functionality. urlparse and os.path are very useful modules but I doubt that they would have been successful on PyPI.
Are you saying your proposed module is so simple that anyone can easily replicate it with just a couple of lines of code?
The good news in this case is that the same API has been used successfully in Java and C++ for years so it is unlikely that any major changes will need to be made.
Good. Then the time it takes to "mature" on PyPI would be very short.
-- Lennart Regebro: Python, Zope, Plone, Grok http://regebro.wordpress.com/ +33 661 58 14 64
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]