[Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement (original) (raw)
Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Thu May 27 12:25:37 CEST 2010
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 27 May 2010 14:29:28 +1200 Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
On 27/05/10 01:48, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> I would say it is precisely that extra configurability which separates > the executor pools in the PEP implementation from more flexible general > purpose pools. Wouldn't this be better addressed by adding the relevant options to the futures pools, rather than adding another module that provides almost exactly the same thing with different options?
+1.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]