[Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement (original) (raw)
Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Sat May 29 17:51:52 CEST 2010
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 29/05/10 22:46, Jesse Noller wrote:
On May 28, 2010, at 11:31 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
Since this topic keeps coming up, some reasoning along these lines should go into PEP 3148. I'll type something up this weekend and shoot it to Brian for inclusion. I was hoping to be able to keep it out of the futures pep itself, but it seems that won't work :)
Well, punting on whether or not we actually do part 2 is still fine. As Eric pointed out, there are issues with unpickling that make the wisdom of following through with renaming any existing modules fairly questionable.
Cheers, Nick.
-- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]