[Python-Dev] stable builders (original) (raw)

Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Tue Oct 5 23:12:31 CEST 2010

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:55 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:

I guess somebody would need to do monitoring on them, and ping operators if the buildbot is down for an extended period of time. Feel free to ping any operator whenever you notice that a slave is down (they do get an automated email, but people can get resistant to automated emails).

Also, if you would want to propose that a different set than the current ones should be considered stable, please let me know. I believe "stable" was meant in a different way, though - it would reliably pass all tests, and a test failure should be considered a bug, rather than some random failure on the slave.

To simplify the task of contacting buildbot operators, would it be worth having a "python-buildbot-owners" mailing list?

Regards, Nick.

-- Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list