[Python-Dev] On breaking modules into packages Was: [issue10199] Move Demo/turtle under Lib/ (original) (raw)
Benjamin Peterson benjamin at python.org
Tue Oct 26 21🔞22 CEST 2010
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] On breaking modules into packages Was: [issue10199] Move Demo/turtle under Lib/
- Next message: [Python-Dev] On breaking modules into packages Was: [issue10199] Move Demo/turtle under Lib/
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2010/10/26 Alexander Belopolsky <alexander.belopolsky at gmail.com>:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettinger at gmail.com> wrote: ..
Packaging is not always wrong.  Maybe it was the right thing to do for unittest, maybe not. This is an example that I personally find ill-justified.  Particularly annoying is the fact that opening init.py gives you a list of relative imports and sends you to the next file for everything else. Having both main.py and main.py seems redundant.   What were the benefits  that justified unittest.py split?
Mostly it was huge.
-- Regards, Benjamin
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] On breaking modules into packages Was: [issue10199] Move Demo/turtle under Lib/
- Next message: [Python-Dev] On breaking modules into packages Was: [issue10199] Move Demo/turtle under Lib/
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]