[Python-Dev] PEP 384 status (original) (raw)
Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Wed Sep 1 23:31:10 CEST 2010
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 384 status
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 384 status
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
Maybe I've missed your answer, but what would prevent the "inline" solution from working?
Only PEP 7 (since standard support for inline is a C99 feature)
On the other hand, if gcc (including cygwin/mingw) and MSVC support it (even with non-standard spellings), then that objection probably doesn't matter.
(a macro with the result-as-a-pointer is quite ugly) Agreed.
Cheers, Nick.
-- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 384 status
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 384 status
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]