[Python-Dev] PEP 384 status (original) (raw)
Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Fri Sep 3 12:24:21 CEST 2010
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 384 status
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 384 status
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
On 02/09/10 09:04, Nick Coghlan wrote:
I think it would be better if everything dealing with FILE* was a macro rather than a function, yes. How would that help?
Macros (and, as Antoine pointed out, inline functions) will never cross C runtime boundaries, even on Windows. They'll get compiled in when the extension module is built and linked to a C runtime library from there, so it won't matter if that differs from the one that is linked to the Python binary.
Cheers, Nick.
-- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 384 status
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 384 status
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]