[Python-Dev] PyObject_GC_UnTrack() no longer reliable in 2.7? (original) (raw)
"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Fri Sep 24 23:09:37 CEST 2010
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PyObject_GC_UnTrack() no longer reliable in 2.7?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PyObject_GC_UnTrack() no longer reliable in 2.7?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I assume this is unintended because (a) the docs weren't changed to warn about this; and, (b) it's wrong ;-)
It seems Jim is happy with (or has at least accepted) the behavior change. Would you still like to see it fixed (or, rather, have the 2.6 state restored)?
I think it would be possible to have two versions of _PyGC_REFS_UNTRACKED, one being, say, -5. _PyGC_REFS_UNTRACKED_AND_KEEP_IT_THAT_WAY would be what you get when you call PyObject_GC_UnTrack; the code to do automatic tracking/untracking based on contents would use some other new API (which would be non-public in 2.7.x).
Regards, Martin
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PyObject_GC_UnTrack() no longer reliable in 2.7?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PyObject_GC_UnTrack() no longer reliable in 2.7?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]