[Python-Dev] Summary of Python tracker Issues (original) (raw)
Terry Reedy tjreedy at udel.edu
Sun Sep 26 03:51:01 CEST 2010
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Summary of Python tracker Issues
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PyObject_GC_UnTrack() no longer reliable in 2.7?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 9/25/2010 1:08 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 19:02:06 +0200 Georg Brandl<g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote:
Am 25.09.2010 18:53, schrieb Terry Reedy: On 9/25/2010 7:11 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
I'll bother Ezio when he's back. It just feels strange to me that the bit of statistic I feel is most interesting -- whether there are less open bugs at the end of the week than at the start -- is not obvious from the report. As of just now, the default search for all open issues returns 2475. That is down steadily over the last 8 or so weeks from a peak of about 2750 in early June. About 30 people have closed at least one issue in this period. That's really promising. (And that's also why I want to see a negative delta for the "open" count.) Thanks for these numbers! Without any precision on how and why these bugs were closed, these numbers don't mean anything. We would need a breakdown of bug closings according to the "resolution" field, at the minimum.
Doing some hand-counting because I do not have proper (as in sql query) access to the database, closed issues so far for Activity: 2010-09
174 fixed 36 invalid 31 out of date 1 postponed 18 reject 18 won't fix 7 works for me
285
-- Terry Jan Reedy
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Summary of Python tracker Issues
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PyObject_GC_UnTrack() no longer reliable in 2.7?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]