[Python-Dev] Pronouncement needed in issue9675 (original) (raw)

Jesus Cea jcea at jcea.es
Wed Sep 29 01:03:44 CEST 2010

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

On 29/09/10 00:56, Guido van Rossum wrote:

On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc <amauryfa at gmail.com> wrote:

2010/9/28 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com>:

Converting to a Py3k warning sounds like the best option.

Can someone please explain why converting to a PyCapsule object is not an option? PyCObjectAsVoidPtr() and PyCObjectImport() accept Capsules and will work as before. Because bsddb is an external module?

Uhm?. I am confused...

The reason to rollback the deprecation warning is because it is breaking other external modules too, see a previous post. Since there is no 2.8 planned, a deprecation warning is not useful. See the thread linked in the tracker.

About converting the deprecation warning to a py3k warning... Would a py3k warning be converted to an error when python is invoked as "-We"?. If that is the case, we are in the same situation.

Jesus Cea Avion // /// /// jcea at jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/ // // // // // jabber / xmpp:jcea at jabber.org // // ///// . // // // // // "Things are not so easy" // // // // // // "My name is Dump, Core Dump" /// //_/ // // "El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQCVAwUBTKJ0UJlgi5GaxT1NAQILeQP8C7zIMPG7BAAo2+m414c5jvy5f3wAlKG+ PGO+IOw/AF7FQSrLj59IWJ1E6oHWf/64TYS8tLTsHdo+sHm/gyHBXlqLUVIIZEMG YduS7G2zeU1XwDsSKqg3vhoDZXMNVhJkbEUegayuKEltAPK8McElx5Agqz26knHD mFA5aRtDw28= =5/5Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list