[Python-Dev] We should be using a tool for code reviews (original) (raw)
Senthil Kumaran orsenthil at gmail.com
Thu Sep 30 11:12:08 CEST 2010
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] We should be using a tool for code reviews
- Next message: [Python-Dev] We should be using a tool for code reviews
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 07:45:52AM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Somewhat amusing to get to this thread a few minutes after creating a Reitveld issue for the first pass of my urllib.parse patch :)
Hello Nick, could you please point me to that?
Also, in general here are my points on Code Review using Rietveld.
I think, Martin already indicated that Roundup can post to Rietveld instance. That should really be helpful.
I imagine a work-flow like this.
- Contributor creates a patch and uploads to Roundup tracker.
- If the patch is very small or does not require review, the committer can just commit it.
- If the patch does review review, one can click a link to do "Patch Review" wherein only at the moment, the Patch is POSTed the rietveld instance and is available for review.
-- Senthil
"I went to the museum where they had all the heads and arms from the statues that are in all the other museums." -- Steven Wright
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] We should be using a tool for code reviews
- Next message: [Python-Dev] We should be using a tool for code reviews
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]