[Python-Dev] readd u'' literal support in 3.3? (original) (raw)
Benjamin Peterson benjamin at python.org
Thu Dec 8 07:02:22 CET 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] readd u'' literal support in 3.3?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] readd u'' literal support in 3.3?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2011/12/8 Chris McDonough <chrism at plope.com>:
On the heels of Armin's blog post about the troubles of making the same codebase run on both Python 2 and Python 3, I have a concrete suggestion.
It would help a lot for code that straddles both Py2 and Py3 to be able to make use of u'' literals.
Helpful or not helpful, I think that ship has sailed. The earliest it could see the light of day is 3.3, which would leave people trying to support 3.1 and 3.2 in a bind.
-- Regards, Benjamin
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] readd u'' literal support in 3.3?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] readd u'' literal support in 3.3?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]