[Python-Dev] readd u'' literal support in 3.3? (original) (raw)
"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Sun Dec 11 23:50:50 CET 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Tag trackbacks with version (was Re: readd u'' literal support in 3.3?)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] readd u'' literal support in 3.3?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Am 09.12.2011 11:17, schrieb Nick Coghlan:
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote:
On 12/8/2011 8:39 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
on an
entire codebase (for example, using setup.py with flags to run 2to3 during setup). Oh. That explains the 'slow' complaint. As Chris pointed out though, the real problem with the "repeatedly run 2to3" workflow is that it can make interpreting tracebacks from the field really hard.
It's hard, but not really hard. In most cases, the line numbers in the 2to3 result are exactly the same as in the original, and if not, the quoted source in the traceback will give you enough context to find the source line of the problem.
Regards, Martin
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Tag trackbacks with version (was Re: readd u'' literal support in 3.3?)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] readd u'' literal support in 3.3?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]