[Python-Dev] cpython (3.2): don't mention implementation detail (original) (raw)
Benjamin Peterson benjamin at python.org
Tue Dec 20 17:15:12 CET 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] cpython (3.2): don't mention implementation detail
- Next message: [Python-Dev] cpython (3.2): don't mention implementation detail
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2011/12/20 Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net>:
Le mardi 20 décembre 2011 à 10:57 -0500, Benjamin Peterson a écrit :
In that case, I would rather speak of "fast" functions rather than "implemented in C" functions (a la the itertools docs). Would that be acceptable? Definitely.
Done.
-- Regards, Benjamin
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] cpython (3.2): don't mention implementation detail
- Next message: [Python-Dev] cpython (3.2): don't mention implementation detail
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]