[Python-Dev] file.readinto performance regression in Python 3.2 vs. 2.7? (original) (raw)
Eli Bendersky eliben at gmail.com
Fri Nov 25 12:56:05 CET 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] file.readinto performance regression in Python 3.2 vs. 2.7?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] file.readinto performance regression in Python 3.2 vs. 2.7?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> However, the original question remains - on the 100MB file also, although > in 2.7 readinto is 35% faster than readandcopy(), on 3.2 it's about the > same speed (even a few % slower). That said, I now observe with Python 3.3 > the same speed as with 2.7, including the readinto() speedup - so it > appears that the readinto() regression has been solved in 3.3? Any clue > about where it happened (i.e. which bug/changeset)?
It would probably be http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/a1d77c6f4ec1/
Great, thanks. This is an important change, definitely something to wait for in 3.3 Eli -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20111125/e4ff0f8f/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] file.readinto performance regression in Python 3.2 vs. 2.7?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] file.readinto performance regression in Python 3.2 vs. 2.7?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]