[Python-Dev] Status of the built-in virtualenv functionality in 3.3 (original) (raw)
Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Thu Oct 6 18:04:40 CEST 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Status of the built-in virtualenv functionality in 3.3
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Status of the built-in virtualenv functionality in 3.3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 12:02:05 -0400 Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote:
>The first part is implemented in CPython; the second part needs a module >name to replace virtualenv. python -m pythonv doesn’t seem right. Nope, although
python -m virtualize
seems about perfect.
python -m sandbox
?
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Status of the built-in virtualenv functionality in 3.3
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Status of the built-in virtualenv functionality in 3.3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]