[Python-Dev] check for PyUnicode_READY look backwards (original) (raw)
Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Thu Oct 6 23:40:20 CEST 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] check for PyUnicode_READY look backwards
- Next message: [Python-Dev] check for PyUnicode_READY look backwards
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> wrote:
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc <amauryfa gmail.com> writes:
I'd prefer it was written : if (PyUnicodeREADY(*filename) < 0) because "< 0" clearly indicates an error condition. Why not just have it return 0 on error? This would be more consistent with API functions that return "false" values like NULL and would just be if (!PyUnicodeREADY(s)) return NULL; in code.
Alas, that isn't the convention in C - courtesy of Unix, the convention is that for integer return codes, "0" means success. Yes, this is annoying, but violating it means you're not writing idiomatic C any more, you're trying to write Python-in-C.
Cheers, Nick.
-- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] check for PyUnicode_READY look backwards
- Next message: [Python-Dev] check for PyUnicode_READY look backwards
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]