[Python-Dev] Documentation strategy for PEP 3151 (original) (raw)
Terry Reedy tjreedy at udel.edu
Wed Oct 12 22:58:15 CEST 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Documentation strategy for PEP 3151
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Documentation strategy for PEP 3151
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 10/12/2011 10:58 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Oct 12, 2011, at 10:24 AM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
2011/10/12 Antoine Pitrou<solipsis at pitrou.net>: I'd like some advice on what the best path is in cases such as:
A :exc:
socket.error
is raised for errors from the call to :func:inetntop
. Should I replace "socket.error" with "OSError" (knowing that the former is now an alias of the latter), or leave "socket.error" so that people have less surprises when running their code with a previous Python version? I think you should say OSError but leave a historical note with a versionchanged on it. +1
Given that tracebacks for uncaught socket errors will end with OSError, the doc should say that is what is raised. The edits and notes I have seen so far today look fine.
I also liked the What's New example. The new version looks much better, and not just because of the deleted import, but because the changes allow a much clearer structure that is more pleasant to read. So my thanks also for carrying out this project.
-- Terry Jan Reedy
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Documentation strategy for PEP 3151
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Documentation strategy for PEP 3151
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]