[Python-Dev] memcmp performance (original) (raw)
Richard Saunders richismyname at me.com
Thu Oct 20 20:15:23 CEST 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython (2.7): Fix closes Issue12529 - cgi.parse_header failure on double quotes and
- Next message: [Python-Dev] memcmp performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi,
This is my first time on Python-dev, so I apologize for my newbie-ness.
I have been doing some performance experiments with memcmp, and I was surprised that memcmp wasn't faster than it was in Python. I did a whole, long analysis and came up with some very simple results.
Before I put in a tracker bug report, I wanted to present my findings and make sure they were repeatable to others (isn't that the nature of science? ;) as well as offer discussion.
The analysis is a pdf and is here: http://www.picklingtools.com/study.pdf The testcases are a tarball here: http://www.picklingtools.com/PickTest5.tar.gz
I have three basic recommendations in the study: I am curious what other people think.
Gooday,
Richie
-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20111020/a68bda29/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython (2.7): Fix closes Issue12529 - cgi.parse_header failure on double quotes and
- Next message: [Python-Dev] memcmp performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]