[Python-Dev] PEP 3145 (With Contents) (original) (raw)
Chris Jerdonek chris.jerdonek at gmail.com
Thu Dec 20 21:55:05 CET 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3145 (With Contents)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3145 (With Contents)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
And please do not CC the peps mailing list on discussions. It should only be used to mail in new PEPs or acceptable patches to PEPs.
PEP 1 should perhaps be clarified if the above is the case. Currently, PEP 1 says all PEP-related e-mail should be sent there:
"The PEP editors assign PEP numbers and change their status. Please send all PEP-related email to <peps at python.org> (no cross-posting please). Also see PEP Editor Responsibilities & Workflow below."
as well as:
"A PEP editor must subscribe to the <peps at python.org> list. All PEP-related correspondence should be sent (or CC'd) to <peps at python.org> (but please do not cross-post!)."
(Incidentally, the statement not to cross-post seems contradictory if a PEP-related e-mail is also sent to python-dev, for example.)
--Chris
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:20 PM, anatoly techtonik <techtonik at gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Gregory P. Smith <greg at krypto.org> wrote:
I'm really not sure what this PEP is trying to get at given that it contains no examples and sounds from the descriptions to be adding a complicated api on top of something that already, IMNSHO, has too much it (subprocess.Popen). Regardless, any user can use the stdout/err/in file objects with their own code that handles them asynchronously (yes that can be painful but that is what is required for any socket or pipe I/O you don't want to block on). And how to use stdout/stderr/in asynchronously in cross-platform manner? IIUC the problem is that every read is blocking.
It sounds to me like this entire PEP could be written and released as a third party module on PyPI that offers a subprocess.Popen subclass adding some more convenient non-blocking APIs. That's where I'd start if I were interested in this as a future feature. I've rewritten the PEP based on how do I understand the code. I don't know how to update it and how to comply with open documentation license, so I just attach it and add PEPs list to CC. Me too has a feeling that the PEP should be stripped of additional high level API until low level functionality is well understood and accepted. -- anatoly t.
Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/brett%40python.org
Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/chris.jerdonek%40gmail.com
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3145 (With Contents)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3145 (With Contents)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]