[Python-Dev] PEP 409 update [was: PEP 409 (original) (raw)
Ethan Furman ethan at stoneleaf.us
Fri Feb 3 03:58:47 CET 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 409 update [was: PEP 409 - final?]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 409 update [was: PEP 409 - final?]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote:
Nick Coghlan wrote:
FWIW, I expect the implementation will allow "raise exc from Ellipsis" as an odd synonym for "raise exc".
Are we sure we want that? Raising from something not an exception seems counter-intuitive (None being the obvious exception). It isn't so much a matter of wanting it as "Is it problematic enough to put any effort into preventing it?" (since allowing it is a natural outcome of the obvious implementation). I would say yes we want that. It would be strange if you couldn't reset a variable explicitly to its default value. I don't expect people to do this often. But somebody might want to do a deep copy of an exception (with some systematic change), or there might be other reasons. I'm sure a few Python zen items apply here. :-)
Okey-doke, I'll get it going.
Ethan
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 409 update [was: PEP 409 - final?]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 409 update [was: PEP 409 - final?]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]