[Python-Dev] requirements for moving import over to importlib? (original) (raw)
Brett Cannon brett at python.org
Wed Feb 8 21:16:54 CET 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] requirements for moving __import__ over to importlib?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] requirements for moving __import__ over to importlib?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 14:57, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote:
On 2/8/2012 11:13 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 22:47, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com
I'm not sure such an addition would help much with the base interpreter start up time though - most of the modules we bring in are because we're actually using them for some reason. It wouldn't. This would be for third-parties only. such as hg. That is what I had in mind. Would the following work? Treat a function as a 'loop' in that it may be executed repeatedly. Treat 'import x' in a function as what it is, an import call plus a local assignment. Apply a version of the usual optimization: put a sys.modules-based lazy import outside of the function (at the top of the module?) and leave the local assignment "x = sys.modules['x']" in the function. Change sys.modules.delattr to replace a module with a dummy, so the function will still work after a deletion, as it does now.
Probably, but I would hate to force people to code in a specific way for it to work. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20120208/cba4180f/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] requirements for moving __import__ over to importlib?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] requirements for moving __import__ over to importlib?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]