[Python-Dev] PEP 410 (Decimal timestamp): the implementation is ready for a review (original) (raw)
Gregory P. Smith greg at krypto.org
Wed Feb 15 02:13:16 CET 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 410 (Decimal timestamp): the implementation is ready for a review
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 410 (Decimal timestamp): the implementation is ready for a review
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote:
My primary concern with the PEP is adding to users confusion when they have to handle (at least) 5 different types[*] that represent time in Python. My key question to those advocating the use of timedelta instead of Decimal: What should timedelta.totalseconds() return to avoid losing nanosecond precision? How should this be requested when calling the API?
It should return a float as it does today. Add a timedelta.total_nanoseconds() call for people wanting high precision as a raw number and remind people of the precision limits of total_seconds() in the docs.
-gps
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 410 (Decimal timestamp): the implementation is ready for a review
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 410 (Decimal timestamp): the implementation is ready for a review
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]