[Python-Dev] PEP 410 (Decimal timestamp): the implementation is ready for a review (original) (raw)
Victor Stinner victor.stinner at gmail.com
Wed Feb 15 14:21:37 CET 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 410 (Decimal timestamp): the implementation is ready for a review
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 410 (Decimal timestamp): the implementation is ready for a review
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I'd like to remind people what the original point of the PEP process was: to avoid going in cycles in discussions. To achieve this, the PEP author is supposed to record all objections in the PEP, even if he disagrees (and may state rebuttals for each objection that people brought up).
So, Victor: please record all objections in a separate section of the PEP, rather than just rebutting in them in the PEP (as is currently the case).
Ok, I will try to list alternatives differently, e.g. by listing also advantages. I didn't know what a PEP is supposed to contain.
Victor
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 410 (Decimal timestamp): the implementation is ready for a review
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 410 (Decimal timestamp): the implementation is ready for a review
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]