[Python-Dev] Proposing an alternative to PEP 410 (original) (raw)
Larry Hastings larry at hastings.org
Sun Feb 26 10:50:11 CET 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Proposing an alternative to PEP 410
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Proposing an alternative to PEP 410
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 02/25/2012 03:31 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Barry Warsaw<barry at python.org> wrote:
On Feb 23, 2012, at 01:28 PM, Larry Hastings wrote:
* Change the result of os.stat to be a custom class rather than a PyStructSequence. Support the sequence protocol on the custom class but mark it PendingDeprecation [...] +1 Yeah, the sequence protocol is outdated here. Would this be a mutable or an immutable object?
Immutable, just like the current PyStructSequence object.
//arry/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20120226/24705588/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Proposing an alternative to PEP 410
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Proposing an alternative to PEP 410
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]