[Python-Dev] PEP 414 - Unicode Literals for Python 3 (original) (raw)
"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Mon Feb 27 21:17:28 CET 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 414 - Unicode Literals for Python 3
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 414 - Unicode Literals for Python 3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Am 27.02.2012 18:05, schrieb Ethan Furman:
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Am 26.02.2012 07:06, schrieb Nick Coghlan:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
A small quibble: I'd like to see a benchmark of a 'u' function implemented in C. Even if it was quite fast, I don't think such a function would bring the same benefits as restoring support for u'' literals. You claim that, but your argument doesn't actually support that claim (or I fail to see the argument). Python 2.6 code: this = u'that' Python 3.3 code: this = u('that') Not source compatible, not elegant. (Even though 2to3 could make this fix, it's still kinda ugly.)
No:
Python 2.6 code
this = u('that')
Python 3.3 code
this = u('that')
It is source compatible, and 100% so. As for elegance: I find the u prefix fairly inelegant already; the function removes just a little more elegance.
Regards, Martin
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 414 - Unicode Literals for Python 3
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 414 - Unicode Literals for Python 3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]