[Python-Dev] PEP 414 - Unicode Literals for Python 3 (original) (raw)
Lennart Regebro regebro at gmail.com
Wed Feb 29 07:35:55 CET 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 414 - Unicode Literals for Python 3
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 414 - Unicode Literals for Python 3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 16:39, Vinay Sajip <vinay_sajip at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka gmail.com> writes:
Another pertinent question: "What are disadvantages of PEP 414 is adopted?" It's moot, but as I see it: the purpose of PEP 414 is to facilitate a single codebase across 2.x and 3.x.
The bytes/native/unicode issue is an issue even if you use 2to3. But of course that is a form of "single codebase" so maybe that's what you meant. :-)
//Lennart
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 414 - Unicode Literals for Python 3
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 414 - Unicode Literals for Python 3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]