[Python-Dev] PEP 362 Third Revision (original) (raw)

Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Fri Jun 15 13:36:54 CEST 2012


On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov.ml at gmail.com> wrote:

On 2012-06-14, at 11:21 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov.ml at gmail.com> wrote:

On 2012-06-14, at 7:16 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:

POSITIONALONLY POSITIONALORKEYWORD VARPOSITIONAL KEYWORDONLY VARKEYWORD I like those.  A bit too lengthy and verbose, but the names are consistent. In this case, I'm willing to trade a bit of verbosity for accuracy. It also suggests a possible, more explicit name for the attribute: "binding". Can we keep it called 'kind'? While technically 'binding' is more precise description for this, it's not as intuitive as 'kind'.

Sure, I'm still OK with "kind".

Cheers, Nick.

-- Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia



More information about the Python-Dev mailing list