[Python-Dev] Signed packages (original) (raw)
Donald Stufft donald.stufft at gmail.com
Fri Jun 22 19:11:34 CEST 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Signed packages
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Signed packages
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Not at the moment, but I could gather them up and make them public later today. They are very rough draft at the moment.
On Friday, June 22, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Alexandre Zani wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Donald Stufft <donald.stufft at gmail.com (mailto:donald.stufft at gmail.com)> wrote: > On Friday, June 22, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Alexandre Zani wrote: > > > Key distribution is the real issue though. If there isn't a key > distribution infrastructure in place, we might as well not bother with > signatures. PyPI could issue x509 certs to packagers. You wouldn't be > able to verify that the name given is accurate, but you would be able > to verify that all packages with the same listed author are actually > by that author. > > I've been sketching out ideas for key distribution, but it's very much > a chicken and egg problem, very few people sign their packages (because > nothing uses it currently), and nobody is motivated to work on > infrastructure > or tooling because no one signs their packages. >
Are those ideas available publicly? I would love to chip in.
-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20120622/c72dfe6b/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Signed packages
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Signed packages
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]