[Python-Dev] im_func: implementation detail? (original) (raw)
Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Sun Mar 11 21:53:31 CET 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] im_func: implementation detail?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Where to discuss PEP 382 vs. PEP 402 (namespace packages)?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote:
How does someone know if something in CPython is an implementation detail or not?
Sadly, there's a large grey area where the language reference doesn't have enough rigor, so asking here is often the only way.
In the case of imfunc, I think it is (an implementation detail), and another person thinks it is part of the language spec. That all implementations must have.
It's part of the language spec. However it's now called func.
-- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] im_func: implementation detail?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Where to discuss PEP 382 vs. PEP 402 (namespace packages)?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]