[Python-Dev] Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives (original) (raw)
Matt Joiner anacrolix at gmail.com
Tue Mar 13 06:10:18 CET 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Definitely think some library vetting needs to occur. Superior alternatives do exist and are difficult to find and choose from. Stuff like LXML, Requests, Tornado are clear winners.
The more of this done externally (ie PyPI the better). I still think a set of requirements for "official approval" would be good. This could outline things like requiring that certain stable Python versions are supported, interface stability, demonstrated user base, documentation etc. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20120313/a7ab2275/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]