[Python-Dev] Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives (original) (raw)
Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Wed Mar 14 17:40:19 CET 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:26:09 +0800 Matt Joiner <anacrolix at gmail.com> wrote:
> Can you give a pointer to these one-liners? > Once a patch gets a month old or older, it tends to disappear from > everyone's radar unless you somehow "ping" on the tracker, or post a > message to the mailing-list.
All of these can be verified with a few minutes of checking the described code paths. http://bugs.python.org/issue13839 http://bugs.python.org/issue13872 http://bugs.python.org/issue12684 http://bugs.python.org/issue13694
Thanks. You did get some comments and answers on some of these issues, though (especially on http://bugs.python.org/issue13872 ).
Regards
Antoine.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]