[Python-Dev] Integrating the PEP 397 launcher (original) (raw)
Brian Curtin brian at python.org
Fri Mar 30 00:50:01 CEST 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Integrating the PEP 397 launcher
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Integrating the PEP 397 launcher
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 17:45, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> wrote:
2012/3/29 Brian Curtin <brian at python.org>:
After talking with Martin and several others during the language summit and elsewhere around PyCon, PEP 397 should be accepted. I don't remember who, but some suggested it should just be a regular old feature instead of going through the PEP process. So...does this even need to continue the PEP process? If you have a PEP and it's accepted, what would be the difference?
In the end? Nothing. It was a comment about this whole process not even needing to exist.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Integrating the PEP 397 launcher
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Integrating the PEP 397 launcher
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]