[Python-Dev] Open PEPs and large-scale changes for 3.3 (original) (raw)
Brett Cannon brett at python.org
Tue May 1 22:12:10 CEST 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Open PEPs and large-scale changes for 3.3
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Open PEPs and large-scale changes for 3.3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:26, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov.ml at gmail.com>wrote:
On 2012-05-01, at 7:57 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
> With 3.3a3 tagged and the beta stage currently 2 months away, I would like > to draw your attention to the following list of possible features for 3.3 > as specified by PEP 398: > > Candidate PEPs: > > * PEP 362: Function Signature Object Regarding PEP 362: there are some outstanding issues with the PEP, that should be resolved. I've outlined some in this email: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-March/117540.html If Brett is tied up with the importlib integration,
Yes I am. =)
I'd be glad to offer my help with adjustment of the PEP and reference implementation update.
That would be great! First thing is addressing Guido's concerns from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-March/117515.html and then handling any issues you found. Not sure if Larry was asking about this out of curiosity or because he too wanted to help.
I think the overall trick is keeping the API simple so it's easy to use but exposes what one could reasonably need (e.g. I wouldn't try to keep the order of keyword-only arguments). -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20120501/a6f28d7e/attachment-0001.html>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Open PEPs and large-scale changes for 3.3
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Open PEPs and large-scale changes for 3.3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]