[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Issue #14127: Add ns= parameter to utime, futimes, and lutimes. (original) (raw)
Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Fri May 4 08:36:37 CEST 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Issue #14127: Add ns= parameter to utime, futimes, and lutimes.
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Issue #14127: Add ns= parameter to utime, futimes, and lutimes.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Larry Hastings <larry at hastings.org> wrote:
Finally, I appreciate the feedback, but... why post it to python-dev? You could have sent me private email, or posted to the issue (#14127), the latter of which would have enabled using rich chocolaty Rietveld. I've seen a bunch of comments on checkins posted here and it all leaves me scratching my head.
It's just the way post-checkin review is set up - the "Follow-up-to" header for the python-checkins mailing list is python-dev. Such comments are rare enough and the fact that they apply to already committed code is important enough that there hasn't been a major push to get the scheme changed to anything else (by contrast, the old process where comments went back to python-checkins was problematic, as they would get lost in the flow of actual checkin messages, hence the switch to the current system).
Cheers, Nick.
-- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Issue #14127: Add ns= parameter to utime, futimes, and lutimes.
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Issue #14127: Add ns= parameter to utime, futimes, and lutimes.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]