[Python-Dev] sys.implementation (original) (raw)
Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Wed May 9 16:50:39 CEST 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] sys.implementation
- Next message: [Python-Dev] sys.implementation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 9 May 2012 10:44:59 -0400 Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
> I wish there was a builtin class > > class record: > pass > > which can be used to create objects which have only attributes > and no methods.
I have heard this request now a bazillion times over the years. Why don't we have such an empty class sitting somewhere in the stdlib with a constructor classmethod to simply return new instances (and if you want to get really fancy, optional keyword arguments to update the instance with the keys/values passed in)? Is it simply because it's just two lines of Python that everyone has replicated at some point?
In this case, it's because sys is a built-in module written in C, and importing Python code is a no-go.
We have a similar problem with ABCs: io jumps through hoops to register its implementation classes with the I/O ABCs.
Regards
Antoine.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] sys.implementation
- Next message: [Python-Dev] sys.implementation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]