[Python-Dev] sys.implementation (original) (raw)
Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Thu May 10 12:21:17 CEST 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] sys.implementation
- Next message: [Python-Dev] sys.implementation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2012 11:33:14 +1000 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
The original concern (that sys.implementation may differ in length across implementations) has been eliminated by moving all implementation specific values into sys.implementation.metadata. Uh. It's scary the kind of things people sometimes come up with :-) sys.implementation.metadata looks like a completely over-engineered concept. Please, let's just make sys.implementation a dict and stop bothering about ordering and iterability.
Aye. Add a rule that all implementation specific (i.e. not defined in the PEP) keys must be prefixed with an underscore and I'm sold.
Cheers, Nick.
-- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] sys.implementation
- Next message: [Python-Dev] sys.implementation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]