[Python-Dev] PEP 426 comment: field order (original) (raw)
Daniel Holth dholth at gmail.com
Thu Oct 18 21:07:10 CEST 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 426 comment: field order
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 426 comment: field order
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Will add that the order is not significant. It is essentially a multidict.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:45 PM, <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
I'd like to request that PEP 426 is extended to talk about the order of fields. In particular, for the Extension field, is it necessary that all "additional tags" follow immediately the respective Extension field?
I also request that RFC 2119 terminology is followed strictly. In particular, the phrasing "Additional tags defined by the extension should be of the form string/Name:" is unclear - under what "particular circumstances" can I deviate from that requirement, i.e. use some form other than string/Name? Regards, Martin
Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/dholth%40gmail.com
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 426 comment: field order
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 426 comment: field order
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]