[Python-Dev] Rejecting PEPs 407 and 413? (original) (raw)

Larry Hastings larry at hastings.org
Fri Oct 19 13:01:09 CEST 2012

On 10/18/2012 08:02 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:

With the 3.4 release PEP published using a traditional schedule, perhaps MvL would care to do the honours as BDFL-Delegate in rejecting the two "faster release cycle for the standard library" PEPs?

(I know I asked to hold off on that when MvL last brought it up, but I've since realised that "do the first alpha early" isn't a stand-alone PEP, it's just a matter of convincing Larry it's worthwhile and negotiating timing with the release team after there are some release-worthy features on trunk)

FWIW I don't think those peps should be rejected simply because I didn't follow either for the 3.4 release schedule. I think they should both have their day in the court of public opinion. (Of course, maybe that day has already passed.)

//arry/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20121019/ad994db5/attachment.html>

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list