[Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers) (original) (raw)
Stefan Krah stefan at bytereef.org
Sat Oct 27 14:33:41 CEST 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Maciej Fijalkowski <fijall at gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Armin Rigo <arigo at tunes.org> wrote: > May I express doubts about telco? :-) It looks like the Python 3 > version is simply not running: > >> ### telco ### >> Min: 0.810000 -> 0.010000: 81.00x faster >> Avg: 0.823600 -> 0.015200: 54.18x faster
I think the original explanation was cDecimal vs decimal.
Yes, the magnitude of the speedup looks correct. In an isolated benchmark with the large input file [1] I'm getting 30x speedup for telco.
Stefan Krah
[1] http://www.bytereef.org/mpdecimal/quickstart.html#telco-benchmark - expon180-1e6b.zip
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]