[Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers) (original) (raw)
Brett Cannon bcannon at gmail.com
Sat Oct 27 15:20:36 CEST 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I did check that markup safe as not installed. It might just be mako doing something silly.
The threads tests are very synthetic.
And yes, there are more modules at startup. When was the last to,e we looked at them to make sure we weren't doing needless I ports? On Oct 27, 2012 5:56 AM, "Antoine Pitrou" <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 15:14:08 -0400 Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote: > > Worst benchmark is nositestartup, best is telco. The benchmarks people > might want to analyze (i.e. more than 20% slower in Python 3.3) are > makov2, threadedcount, normalstartup, iterativecount, pathlib, > formattedlogging, and simplelogging.
Well, did you check that makov2 wasn't subject to the Markupsafe issue? threadedcount and iterativecount are completely dumb. Slower startup is due to the fact that Python 3 needs many more modules to even start itself. Regards Antoine.
Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/brett%40python.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20121027/287a5ce5/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]