[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: PEP for updating the URL layout on docs.python.org (original) (raw)
Chris Jerdonek chris.jerdonek at gmail.com
Sun Oct 28 13:19:26 CET 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: PEP for updating the URL layout on docs.python.org
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: PEP for updating the URL layout on docs.python.org
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote:
Am 28.10.2012 12:29, schrieb Chris Jerdonek: ... I understand "latest" to mean "latest stable plus bugfixes". I.e., /3/ is 3.3.0+. /dev and /3.4 is 3.4a0. It might need clarifying in the PEP. ...
There's a slight mismatch with how we're doing it today because "http://docs.python.org/3/" shows 3.3.0 in the title even though it's the in-progress 3.3.1. The title should perhaps reflect that it's post 3.3.0 (and similarly for the 2.7 and 3.2 pages). Well, that has always been the case, and it doesn't matter anyway, because generally there's nothing in 3.3.1, feature-wise, that won't have been in 3.3.0.
One reason to change would be to avoid possible confusion created on pages like this--
http://docs.python.org/3.3/whatsnew/3.2.html
where it says--
Author: Raymond Hettinger Release: 3.3.0 Date: October 27, 2012
Would there be any disadvantage to changing the in-development titles to read something like 3.3.0+, etc?
--Chris
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: PEP for updating the URL layout on docs.python.org
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: PEP for updating the URL layout on docs.python.org
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]