[Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers) (original) (raw)
Catalin Iacob iacobcatalin at gmail.com
Sun Oct 28 21:53:33 CET 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote:
Interestingly, I just did a quick test of this: This is on my Windows 7 PC, running under Powershell.
snip
Looks like the normal configuration is over twice as fast as the zipped one...
This result is influenced by zipimport fseek-ing for every file in the imported zip and fseek flushing buffers in Microsoft's CRT implementation. There's a patch which avoids the seek in http://bugs.python.org/issue8745. Reviews welcome!
With that patch the time taken to import is half of the current state of things so according to your test that would make zipped and non zipped configurations roughly equally fast.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]