[Python-Dev] configure produces a non-working Makefile in some scenarios, due to ASDLGEN (original) (raw)
Ned Deily nad at acm.org
Mon Oct 29 00:19:36 CET 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] configure produces a non-working Makefile in some scenarios, due to ASDLGEN
- Next message: [Python-Dev] configure produces a non-working Makefile in some scenarios, due to ASDLGEN
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <20121028194043.09415a50 at pitrou.net>, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 18:24:36 +0000 (UTC) Vinay Sajip <vinaysajip at yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > In some scenarios, configure produces a Makefile which fails because > ASDLGEN > doesn't point to a working Python. In particular, it seems to assume that > if > there is an executable called e.g. "python3.4" on the path, then that will > be a > system Python. > > In my perhaps unusual but IMO perfectly valid setup, I have various Python > repos > set up like so: > > $HOME/projects/python > | > +- default > | > +- 3.3 > | > + and so on for 3.2, 3.1, 2.7 > > In order to facilitate testing some script against multiple Python > versions, I > have shell scripts in $HOME/bin named python3.4, python3.3 etc. which just > run > the programs in the relevant directories in $HOME/projects/python/. (I know > I > can do this using aliases etc., but I think that's beside the point.) > > When I run configure in the repo for the default branch, it appears to look > for > a Python on the path named python3.4, finds one in $HOME/bin, and thus > generates > an ASDLGEN value of "python3.4". If I happen to have a built Python in the > default repo, then the script in $HOME/bin will successfully run that, and > all > appears well; but if I clean the default repo and re-run make, it fails at > the > ASDLGEN step, because the $HOME/bin/python3.4 script fails, due to not > being > able to invoke $HOME/projects/python/default/python. > > Is this a bug in configure, or is my configuration regarded as too perverse > to > support?
The latter IMO :)
Not at all, IMO :)
This behavior is a change recently introduced by the changesets
associated with http://bugs.python.org/issue16262. Previously, the
first python
on $PATH was used if asdl_c.py needed to be run in the
Makefile. You now have the opportunity to override the behavior at
./configure time by using the PYTHON variable to specify the path to the
Python executable you want to use for the asdl_c.py step, as in:
./configure ... PYTHON=/usr/bin/python2.7
-- Ned Deily, nad at acm.org
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] configure produces a non-working Makefile in some scenarios, due to ASDLGEN
- Next message: [Python-Dev] configure produces a non-working Makefile in some scenarios, due to ASDLGEN
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]