[Python-Dev] objections to renaming enumobject.h/c in 3.4? (original) (raw)
Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Sat Aug 3 07:50:56 CEST 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] objections to renaming enumobject.h/c in 3.4?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] objections to renaming enumobject.h/c in 3.4?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 3 Aug 2013 13:50, "Eli Bendersky" <eliben at gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all, I was looking around the Objects directory and noticed that we have enumobject.h/c with the enumobject structure for "enumerate" and "reversed". This is somewhat confusing now with Lib/enum.py and will be doubly confusing if we ever decide to have a C implementation of enums. Any objections to renaming the files and the internal structure & static functions with s/enum/enumerate/ ? This would more accurately reflect the use of the code, and avoid confusion with enums. These structures/types are not part of the stable ABI defined by PEP 384.
Sounds good to me.
Cheers, Nick.
Eli
Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ncoghlan%40gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130803/a7c16ca2/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] objections to renaming enumobject.h/c in 3.4?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] objections to renaming enumobject.h/c in 3.4?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]