[Python-Dev] Submitting PEP 422 (Simple class initialization hook) for pronouncement (original) (raw)
PJ Eby pje at telecommunity.com
Sun Feb 10 22:27:49 CET 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Submitting PEP 422 (Simple class initialization hook) for pronouncement
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Submitting PEP 422 (Simple class initialization hook) for pronouncement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
class Example: @classmethod def initclass(cls):
Is the @classmethod required? What happens if it's not present?
Second, will type have a default init_class? (IMO, it should, otherwise it will be impossible to write co-operative init_class functions.)
Only other comment is that the PEP could use a more concrete use case, e.g.:
class Record:
__fields = {}
@classmethod
def __init_class__(cls):
cls.__fields = dict(cls.__fields) # inherited fields
cls.__fields.update({attr:val for attr, val in
cls.dict.iteritems() if isinstance(val, Field)}) super().init_class() # be co-operative
# ...other methods that use the __fields attribute
class SomeRecord(Record):
foo = Field(int)
bar = Field(str)
Putting something like this early on might help to demonstrate the usefulness of the feature on its own merits, independent of the porting issue, etc. ;-)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Submitting PEP 422 (Simple class initialization hook) for pronouncement
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Submitting PEP 422 (Simple class initialization hook) for pronouncement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]