[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: PEP 426: replace implied 'version starts with' with new ~= operator (original) (raw)
Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Sat Feb 23 16:23:24 CET 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: PEP 426: replace implied 'version starts with' with new ~= operator
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Pre-alpha draft for PEP 435 (enum). The name is not important at the moment, as
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 12:57 AM, Vinay Sajip <vinay_sajip at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan gmail.com> writes:
Daniel is a fan of this syntax, but I think it is inferior to the implied approach, so don't expect it to survive to any accepted version of the PEP :) Another thing against ~= is that it isn't valid Python syntax. It's not a deal- breaker, but it does mean that you can't e.g. use the ast module in the implementation. This might be a factor if the mini-language ever grows (as it recently did, adding parentheses).
Daniel persuaded me that the semantics of Ruby's > pessimistic
version comparison operator are highly desirable. I liked them so
much, I'm now proposing them as the default behaviour of version
specifiers. Thus, the "=" operator goes away, and you can use "==" to
explicitly request the previously proposed default behaviour, or just
append an extra ".0" if you're more pessimistic about a dependency's
backwards compatibility policies than the default interpretation.
This and other aspects will be brought up on distutils-sig at some point not too far in the future :)
Cheers, Nick.
-- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: PEP 426: replace implied 'version starts with' with new ~= operator
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Pre-alpha draft for PEP 435 (enum). The name is not important at the moment, as
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]