[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Pre-alpha draft for PEP 435 (enum). The name is not important at the moment, as (original) (raw)
Greg Ewing greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Tue Feb 26 00:53:03 CET 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Pre-alpha draft for PEP 435 (enum). The name is not important at the moment, as
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Pre-alpha draft for PEP 435 (enum). The name is not important at the moment, as
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Barry Warsaw wrote:
>>> Colors = make('Colors', 'red green blue'.split()) >>> Animals = make('Animals', 'ant bee cat'.split()) >>> Colors.green == Animals.bee
The currently suggested solution to that seems to be to make comparison non-transitive, so that Colors.green == 1 and Animals.bee == 1 but Colors.green != Animals.bee. And then hope that this does not create a quantum black hole that sucks us all into a logical singularity...
-- Greg
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Pre-alpha draft for PEP 435 (enum). The name is not important at the moment, as
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Pre-alpha draft for PEP 435 (enum). The name is not important at the moment, as
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]